FREE ASSESSMENT

The Personal LinkedIn Authority Index

Twenty checks. Four minutes. One honest score.

Most technical business owners know their LinkedIn could be working harder. Very few could tell you which part of it is the problem.


That matters, because fixing the wrong pillar is the most common way to waste six months on LinkedIn.


This assessment scores you against twenty specific checks, grouped into the four pillars that decide whether your profile generates enquiries or just sits there. At the end you get a score out of 100, a level, and the one pillar that is costing you the most.


No email needed to see your result.

Assessment

20-Point Assessment

Personal LinkedIn Authority Index

Five checks across four pillars. Find out how hard your LinkedIn profile is actually working, and which part of it is holding the rest back.

No email needed to see your score.


Question 1 of 20

Most technical business owners treat LinkedIn as a place to be rather than a system to run. This scores you against twenty specific checks and tells you which of the four pillars is costing you the most.

20 questions
4 minutes
5 levels
No email needed - your score appears on screen straight away

Your Personal LinkedIn Authority Index

0 out of 100

Your four pillars

What the four pillars are

Profile - checks 1 to 5


Your profile is no longer a CV. LinkedIn now cross-references what you post against your headline, About section and experience when it decides who to show your content to. If it cannot work out what you are an expert in, it cannot distribute your posts properly. A profile written for recruiters is actively costing you reach.


Content - checks 6 to 10


Whether there is an engine running, and whether it says anything worth reading. This pillar covers frequency, consistency of subject, format mix and whether your posts are the kind of thing someone saves to come back to. Posting more is rarely the answer on its own. Posting deliberately, about two or three defined subjects, nearly always is.


Network and engagement - checks 11 to 15


Reach is not a reward for posting. It is a function of who is in your network, whether you show up in other people's comments, and what happens in the first hour after you publish. Plenty of good content dies here, seen by suppliers and old colleagues rather than buyers.


Measurement and conversion - checks 16 to 20


The loop. Whether you know what worked, why it worked, and where the traffic went afterwards. Without it, every improvement is guesswork, and guesswork plateaus. This is the pillar most businesses score lowest on, and the one that separates a channel from a hobby.

How the scoring works

Each of the twenty checks scores from zero to three, weakest answer to strongest. Your total is converted to a score out of 100, and you also get a percentage for each of the four pillars, so you can see at a glance which one is dragging the others down.


Level 1 - Dormant (0 to 20)


The profile exists. It is not doing any selling.


Level 2 - Idle (21 to 40)


Something happens when you post, but there is no rhythm and no route to a conversation.


Level 3 - Running (41 to 60)


You are ahead of most of your industry. The gap is usually one pillar, not all four.


Level 4 - Tuned (61 to 84)


The fundamentals are working. What is missing is usually the measurement loop.


Level 5 - Optimised (85 to 100)


All four pillars pulling together. The questions now are about scale and delegation.


A word on the bands: they are a considered starting point, not a scientific instrument. If you land near a boundary, read both descriptions - the useful information is in your pillar breakdown, not the headline number.

Why the personal profile and not the company page

This assessment scores your personal profile only, and that is deliberate.


Company page organic reach has collapsed. In a controlled comparison normalised per follower, a brand page produced around 980 impressions per 1,000 followers in one quarter while an employee profile produced over 70,000.


That is not a rounding difference. It is a structural change in how the platform distributes content, and it means the highest-leverage work for a technical business is almost always on the founder's and the team's personal profiles, with the company page serving as credibility infrastructure behind them.


The company page still matters. It is just a different job, and a different conversation.



What happens after your score

If you score below 85, you get two options. The 20-Point Fix List walks through every check in order with what full marks actually looks like, so you can work through it yourself, starting with your weakest pillar. Or you can book a free 90-minute consultation and we will go through your score together.



If you score 85 or above, a checklist is not going to tell you much. The useful conversation at that point is about scale - extending it across the team, whether the company page earns its place, and what measurement looks like when LinkedIn is a genuine channel rather than an experiment.

Who this is for

We built this for owner-managers, commercial directors and operations directors in industrial, engineering and technical businesses. The kind of firm that wins work on capability and reputation, where the founder is often the most credible voice in the building and has never had time to use it properly.



It works for anyone. But the framing, the examples and the recommendations assume a technical B2B business with a considered sales cycle, not a consumer brand chasing volume.

A note on what this is, and isn't

Twenty checks cover the fundamentals that most technical businesses are missing. They are not a complete LinkedIn audit. A real audit looks at your actual profile, your actual posts and your actual analytics, and takes into account your market, your competitors and where your buyers genuinely spend their attention. Treat this as the starting point, not the finish line.

Ai generated clock, ai badge, cog image
By Stefan Buss August 3, 2026
You or your team keeps hitting AI usage limits mid-month. The cause is rarely the model - it is duplicated setup and oversized processing. Seven Lean principles to get more from the licence you already pay for.
AI Generated Google Analytics - SEO Authority - umber made up
By Stefan Buss July 30, 2026
Most technical SME blogs cannot be traced to a real person. The authority triangle - blog, profile and post - is one strong signal that earns organic traffic and AI citations.
ai engineering image
By Stefan Buss July 19, 2026
AI adoption in 2026: the hype says you're five years behind. The research says you're not. A clear, practical guide for SME leaders to move forward with AI.
Hard hat, calculator, with penand plans
By Stefan Buss July 13, 2026
Most SMEs say they'll work with anyone. It's why their marketing converts nobody. Learn the six-level ICP maturity model and how to build a profile that protects margin.
Risks of AI or Industrial Leaders
By Stefan Buss May 20, 2026
Adopting AI carries risk - so does avoiding it. A practical guide for industrial SME leaders on which AI risk to carry, and how to control it.
Woman with a et standing in a factorie
By Stefan Buss May 5, 2026
Myth-busting angle (direct) AEO, GEO, LLMO - the acronyms keep coming. We cut through the hype and show why solid SEO fundamentals still drive real growth for SMEs.
Apple Turns 50: What Steve Jobs Taught Us About Product Marketing Strategy
By Stefan Buss April 7, 2026
Steve Jobs built an iconic brand through product marketing strategy, ecosystem thinking and a fiercely loyal community. Here's what it teaches us about sales and marketing strategy.
Man siting at a desk look it a computer screen working.
By Stefan Buss March 10, 2026
AI platforms can fold, get hacked or change overnight. If your prompts, workflows and business knowledge live only in chat history, you're exposed. Here's how to fix it.
enginng twmen ing at ngering corcton plans.
By Stefan Buss February 5, 2026
Most SMEs skip market analysis and wonder why marketing fails. Discover how to assess demand, spot trends, and steer your entire business direction.
AI Attitude
By Stefan Buss January 19, 2026
We explore the two polar opposites of how people think about AI - all in or against, which camp are you in?